Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Google to pwnz crappy overpiced word processors with \W/ritly
Friday, February 10, 2006
Google Release Version 3 of Desktop
But the big news is the ability to share files with other Desktop/Talk Users which is a feature that Talk had been lacking and one that I felt could be improved in services such as AOL instant Messenger. In Addition you will now be able to search files across multiple computers. To take advantage of this feature you have to install Desktop on all the computers and then choose which files you would like to share. The files are then copied to all the computers. There is concern about this feature because during the copy process the files are temporarily stored on Google's servers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation is not recommending this feature because the storage of the files on Google's servers makes users much more vulnerable to subpoenas. Only a subpoena is required for information stored on service provider servers where as a warrant. The EFF is asking Google to join it in asking the US Congress to strengthen the privacy rights for data stored on service provider servers but Google has yet to respond
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
I can see its getting better, A little Better All the Time
A unique feature of the Jabber system is that of transports, also known as gateways, which allow users to access networks using other protocols - such as AIM and ICQ (using OSCAR), MSN Messenger and Windows Messenger (using the .NET Messenger Service), Yahoo! Messenger, SMS or E-mail. Unlike multi-protocol clients like Trillian or Gaim, Jabber provides this access at the server level by communicating via special gateway services running on a remote computer. Any Jabber user can 'register' with one of these gateways by providing the information needed to log on to that network, and can then communicate with users of that network as though they were Jabber users. This means that any client which fully supports the Jabber protocol can be used to access any network to which a gateway exists, without the need for any extra code in the client.So it looks like it wont neccesary to convert those in the dark ages of AIM and MSN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabber)
Sunday, February 05, 2006
Venture for Sharing Wi-Fi Draws Big-Name Backers Lacks Profitability
The users may sign up to FON in three ways: they can be Bills, Linus or Aliens. What are those names you might ask? The explanation is quite simple: a Linus (who are called like this after Linus Torvalds) shares his/her bandwidth for free with other Foneros, Bills (of course named after Bill Gates) share their bandwidth for a small fee, and Aliens don't share their bandwidth at all.(playfuls.com)So they got 20 mil, but I'm not really sure they have a business model. You can already share or not share you internet connection though your router and pc. So the only thing they seem to be offering is the ability to charge others to use your bandwith. You are still going to have to pay a separate ISP. This would be an interesting program for isps to offer. I think that skype and google could have better spent the money on cable modem service and cisco could supply the routers.
A Google spokeswoman, Lynn Fox, said that the company was an investor in the project but that it was not in a partnership with it. "We're looking forward to seeing how it develops," she said. "We are optimistic that this technology will be good for users, I.S.P.'s and Internet technology companies, as it will enable people to get online more often and from more locations
Well At Least They're not betting the farm on it. This seems like pet company to me. A toy for these big boys. Fon will probably never succeed on Wall Street but will hopefully push the wifi sharing envelope and get people thinking about community networking.
Google has been doing wifi R&D and is a bidder for the deployment of a municipal wifi netowrk for San Francisco
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Happy Chinese New Year: 2006 is the Year of the Google Gag
Google has faired better than this. With two nuts and a wee little shaft, Google is peeking its head into the information oligarchy that is China. Its core principle of total information freedom, however, has undergone a slight modification at the behest of one big-ass country. It is thus that Google may be setting an unfortunate and heretofore unthinkable precedent of philosophical divergence. Hopefully Bush and Homeland Security won't pick up on it.
Google and the Patriot Act in cahoots? I don't want the government knowing that I stroke it to the Google Image search terms 'dustin diamond' AND 'jiffy lube'.
“As was widely reported last week, Google has now joined Yahoo! and Microsoft by censoring its Internet search results in order to do business in China. It was a decision that supposedly tested the company's "don't be evil" pledge, according to Google co-founder Sergey Brin. As Orville Schell, a China scholar and Dean of Berkley’s Graduate School of Journalism, told John Battelle, author of "The Search," "China represents a great paradox for a democratic business culture -- its political culture is repugnant, but its market is far too rich to ignore.”
(Kutnikoff)
Check out the whole article here or by clicking the title above:
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=271724&rel_no=1
Blog Sponsored by Paper911.com
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
The End of Perpetual Beta... At least for News
Blog Sponsored by Paper911.com
Monday, January 23, 2006
Investors See Google’s vulnerabilities
Blog Sponsored by Paper911.com
